What the AirPods Max design story really tells us about Apple
The team spent five years on what he describes as essentially three products, the headband, the case, and the cushion, and ran through "hundreds and hundreds of variations" before shipping.

When a former Apple designer talks publicly, the temptation is to read the interview as gossip. A few quotable lines about the headband, a tidy origin story for a product, maybe a glimpse of Jony Ive.
The recent Highsnobiety profile of Eugene Whang, picked up by AppleInsider, has all of that. Whang spent 22 years at Apple. AirPods Max was one of his last major projects.
The team spent five years on what he describes as essentially three products, the headband, the case, and the cushion, and ran through "hundreds and hundreds of variations" before shipping. There is no Apple logo on the outside of the product because, as Whang puts it, "we didn't want to brand your head."
It would be easy to file this away as another behind the scenes anecdote. It is worth a closer look than that. The interview is one of the clearest accounts in recent memory of how Apple's industrial design team actually thinks, and it lands at a moment when several of the assumptions behind that thinking are under real pressure.
A product that was never a side project
The first thing the interview clarifies is the timeline. AirPods Max arrived in December 2020, four years after the original AirPods and after a long stretch in which Apple's over ear strategy was carried by the Beats brand. The conventional reading at the time was that AirPods Max was an opportunistic extension, a premium accessory tacked onto a category that had unexpectedly become one of Apple's most profitable lines.
Whang's account complicates that. He was working on AirPods Max five years before launch, which puts the start of the project somewhere around 2015, before the first AirPods were even on sale. That is a long runway for a product that has often been treated by observers as an afterthought.
It also suggests that Apple's headphone ambitions were never really about iterating on the earbuds and seeing what stuck. The over ear product was in development in parallel, quietly, for half a decade.
The shape of the work matters too. Whang describes the project as three products, not one. The headband, the case, and the cushion were each their own design problem. The cushion was the hardest, because human heads do not share a standard geometry, and the team experimented with hundreds and hundreds of variants before settling on the magnetic ear cushion design that ships today.

This is consistent with what Apple has always said about its process in the rare moments it has said anything. It is also worth saying plainly that this is the sort of investment that only makes sense if a company is willing to ship slowly and then ship infrequently. AirPods Max sat without a meaningful hardware update from 2020 until the USB C refresh in 2024. For a product that took five years to develop, four years between revisions starts to look less like neglect and more like a deliberate cadence.
The missing logo
The detail from the interview that has traveled fastest is the absence of an Apple logo on the exterior of AirPods Max. Whang's explanation is short and unusually direct. "We didn't want to brand your head."
It is a small line that does a lot of work. Apple is, among other things, one of the most recognized brands on the planet, and the company has historically been comfortable placing its logo on products that sit in public, on desks, in cafes, and on commutes.
The MacBook lid is the canonical example. The back of every iPhone has it. AirPods Max are an exception, and on Whang's account they are a deliberate exception. The reasoning was that wearing a logo on the side of your head is a different kind of brand statement than carrying a phone, and the team did not want to make it.
What this misses, if you only read the line as a marketing choice, is the broader Apple position. The company has spent the last decade easing off conspicuous branding wherever the product itself can do the work.
There is a counter argument that Apple's restraint here is itself a brand strategy, and reasonable people will disagree about how cynical that reading should be. The headphones are still unmistakable. Anyone who recognizes the silhouette, and a lot of people do, knows what they are looking at without help from a logo. Whether that counts as not branding your head or as branding it more elegantly is a matter of taste.

Inside out as a method, not a slogan
The other passage worth holding onto is Whang's description of how the team worked.
If it's not right on the inside, it's not going to be right on the outside. We literally designed from the inside out. The interior details would have as much design work as the exterior. The shape of the PCB. The placement of components. Constant shuffling and Tetris of internals.
This is not new language for anyone who has followed Apple's design coverage. Jony Ive said versions of it in nearly every interview he gave during his tenure.
Steve Jobs talked about the fence behind the house, and the boards inside the original Mac that had to look beautiful even though no customer would see them.
The idea that internal craft drives external quality is one of the founding ideas of Apple's industrial design culture.
What Whang's quote adds is the texture. "Constant shuffling and Tetris of internals" is the kind of phrase that comes from doing the work, not theorizing about it. It points to the practical reality that the design of a product like AirPods Max is constrained at every stage by the components that need to fit inside it, and that those constraints are not separate from the experience of the product.
The way the headphones balance on the head, the weight distribution across the headband, the placement of the sensors that detect when the headphones are removed, all of that is downstream of where the components ended up.
This is also why the cushion was so hard. A cushion that has to seal acoustically around a human ear, transfer weight comfortably across a headband, and accommodate the geometry of an unpredictable population of heads is not a soft good. It is an engineering problem disguised as one. Hundreds of variants is the kind of number you only need when you are trying to solve something that does not have a clean answer.

A note on Whang's exit, and what it implies
Whang left Apple shortly after Jony Ive's departure and followed Ive to LoveFrom, the design studio Ive founded with Marc Newson. He has since left LoveFrom as well, for personal reasons connected to the death of his mother, and now consults independently with smaller teams.
The Highsnobiety piece is in part a profile of his John Pawson designed home in Marin, and it is the most candid view of his post Apple life that has appeared in print.
For readers who care about Apple specifically, the more interesting thread is the LoveFrom connection.
Several of the senior designers who worked with Ive at Apple have followed him out. AppleInsider has tracked at least four such departures previously, and the pattern has continued.
LoveFrom's published work now includes the Ferrari Luce interior, Airbnb's redesign, and reported work for OpenAI. The team that produced products like AirPods Max is no longer assembled at Apple. It is, in some recognizable form, assembled in London, working on cars and interiors and consumer hardware for other companies.
This does not mean Apple's design output has collapsed. The team that remains is large and capable, and the company has continued to ship products that look and feel like Apple products. It does mean that the institutional memory of how the original AirPods Max was made now lives partly outside the company.
Whang's interview is, in a small way, an artifact of that diaspora. It is the kind of thing that gets said out loud only after a designer has moved on.
What the interview is good for
If history is any guide, designer interviews are not a reliable window into what Apple will do next. They are a reliable window into what Apple cared about while a particular product was being made. The Whang interview is most useful read that way. It will not tell you when AirPods Max 3 will arrive, or whether Apple is considering a smaller over ear model, or what the next acoustic platform will look like.
It will tell you that the team that made AirPods Max thought of it as three intertwined products, that they worked on it for five years, that the cushion problem alone consumed hundreds of variants, and that the absence of the Apple logo on the exterior was a deliberate choice with a one sentence justification.
It will tell you that the people inside the design studio worked the way Apple has always said its design studio worked, with the inside of a product mattering as much as the outside. And it will tell you that one of the people most responsible for shaping that approach over two decades is now sitting in a Pawson designed home in Marin County, working with founders and small teams, and choosing carefully what objects he lets through his own front door.
That is not a story about a product launch. It is closer to a story about a school of thought, recounted by someone who attended it for 22 years and is now describing what was on the syllabus.
My Favorite iPhone Accessories:
- Anker Smart Display Charger
- USB-C cable that shows how fast your charging
- MagSafe Car Mount
- Apple AirTag 2 (1 pack / 4 pack)
- Anker Nano MagSafe Power Bank
- AirPods Max 2
Note: That Apple Guide is an affiliate partner with some of these vendors. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running. At no extra cost to you.
Related stories


M5 MacBook Air or M5 MacBook Pro: Which One Is Actually Right for You
Wes Brennan·May 22, 2026·9 min read

The iPhone 18 Pro satellite upgrade I have been waiting for
Hayden Cole·May 22, 2026·4 min read